LogFAQs > #887094083

Amanda at least learned between China and Micronesia. Her Micronesia performance was leagues better than the disastrous finish she had in China, although it was nothing spectacular. What was reminiscent of her China disaster was the sob story she spun at the F3; had she shown confidence there and answered Cirie's FTC question correctly, she could have (and probably would have) won the game. Instead, she discredited herself to the jury and made it hard for them to take her seriously the next night. There's also this notable tidbit: After HvV, Amanda said something pretty important, in that serving on a jury first would have helped her present herself way better at the FTC.

Hantz and Paul would not have learned that even if serving on a jury. Ego is the issue. Their superiority complex makes them think they deserve the win unquestionably, which increases the bitterness level of a jury substantially. A jury will NOT give a large sum of money to someone who treats them like yesterday's garbage. How can you expect a jury to respect you if you don't respect them? Amanda lacked awareness of how the jury would perceive her emotions. Hantz and Paul both lacked respect for their fellow players and still do not understand that to get respect, you have to give it first. Amanda could win Survivor if she were to return. Hatntz and Paul will never win their respective games without changing who they are as a person.
---

http://i.imgur.com/t3naEGu.jpg
I'm BlueCrystalTear, probably at work.