LogFAQs > #886883167

Dragonblade01 posted...

Then bring the same complaint against the people in this thread spouting the same rhetoric that I was commenting on. You also didn't have to respond to what I said if you don't actually disagree with the point I was making. The "counterargument" I made to your reply was based on the understanding that you actually disagreed with me. But if you already don't actually disagree with me then what's the point? I'm not going to apologize for assuming that someone replying to me is arguing a different position.

Your "counterargument" was based on misinterpreting what I said, which is why it was necessary to respond. It's also why you shoulda used a similar response to what I suggested which was not an apology. It's simply recognizing what I actually said since that's how good conversation/dialogue generally goes.


It's even more ridiculous that you'd rather type all of that than 2 to 5 words.

Also, I feel no need to reassert that I don't support violent resolutions, especially given what I just said.
---

If you're not looking for any honest discussion, agreement, meeting halfway or middle ground, don't bother arguing with me. Selfish narcissists need not apply.