LogFAQs > #886242114

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, Database 2 ( 09.16.2017-02.21.2018 ), DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Google censorship cracks down on anti-war left-wing sites, too
Vlado 09/08/17 10:19:16 AM #317:	Mr Lasastryke posted... Vlado posted... My observation stands. no, it doesn't. disliking people is not "childish" (it's a fundamental aspect of adulthood), i'm not "controlled" by my emotions (whatever the fuck that means), and my dislike for people says nothing about my knowledge about geopolitics. so your "observation" is total bullshit. Oh, it totally stands. Disliking people in general is one thing, getting your panties in a bunch over "the face someone makes" is another. That's very childish. The fact that you and many other liberals are controlled by your emotions impedes your ability to think rationally. And without thinking rationally, there's even less of a chance for you to understand complex matters such as geopolitics. And I won't even go into other reasons, e.g. you not reading history or pre-20th century philosophy. Your preference for reading somebody's annotations over the cold facts themselves says all that needs to be said. kevwaffles posted... Vlado posted... Nonsense. Read what you just quoted. Nothing to do with the event we're discussing. Again, the woman is NOT a government official. Representing a government agency in a couple of cases years ago does not make you a government official. First off, read it again. It's not limited to government officials. That just makes it more blatant such that there is a particular question dealing with the premise, but that question isn't the only question. The concept of private foreign citizens fucking with an election isn't impossible. That's even, for argument's sake, ignoring any potential governmental ties, which do exist (at the very least) in the same way I have ties to a former employer. Second, for someone who'll buy into all sorts of conspiracies when it suits him, you of all people should be skeptical when someone claims they aren't working with a government. Or are you the guy who thinks an undercover cop has to tell you they're a cop just because you asked? "In particular, question 20B.6 asks whether the applicant has had any contact at all with any foreign governments or their representatives in the past seven years." Jakyl25 posted... Will you agree that, if she IS actually an agent of the Russian government, that it would be illegal under that clause to obscure the meeting on government disclosure forms? Doesn't even matter until it is proven that she is. Still waiting for these answers, btw: Vlado posted... Again, how do you comment on her anti-Trump facebook posts? Why does Putin send someone to Trump who offers nothing of use? --- Blitzball fan? Try Captain Tsubasa II (in English) for NES! *Best game reviews: http://betweenlifeandgames.com* <cite>Vlado posted [p:886242114] in Google cen... [t:75719721]...</cite> <quote><cite>Mr Lasastryke posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Vlado posted...</cite> <quote>My observation stands.</quote> no, it doesn't. disliking people is not "childish" (it's a fundamental aspect of adulthood), i'm not "controlled" by my emotions (whatever the fuck that means), and my dislike for people says nothing about my knowledge about geopolitics. so your "observation" is total bullshit.</quote> Oh, it totally stands. Disliking people in general is one thing, getting your panties in a bunch over "the face someone makes" is another. That's very childish. The fact that you and many other liberals are controlled by your emotions impedes your ability to think rationally. And without thinking rationally, there's even less of a chance for you to understand complex matters such as geopolitics. And I won't even go into other reasons, e.g. you not reading history or pre-20th century philosophy. Your preference for reading somebody's annotations over the cold facts themselves says all that needs to be said. <cite>kevwaffles posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Vlado posted...</cite> <quote> Nonsense. Read what you just quoted. Nothing to do with the event we're discussing. Again, the woman is NOT a government official. Representing a government agency in a couple of cases years ago does not make you a government official.</quote> First off, read it again. It's not limited to government officials. That just makes it more blatant such that there is a particular question dealing with the premise, but that question isn't the only question. The concept of private foreign citizens fucking with an election isn't impossible. That's even, for argument's sake, ignoring any potential governmental ties, which do exist (at the very least) in the same way I have ties to a former employer. Second, for someone who'll buy into all sorts of conspiracies when it suits him, you of all people should be skeptical when someone claims they aren't working with a government. Or are you the guy who thinks an undercover cop has to tell you they're a cop just because you asked?</quote> "In particular, question 20B.6 asks whether the applicant has had any contact at all with any foreign governments or their representatives in the past seven years." <cite>Jakyl25 posted...</cite> <quote>Will you agree that, if she IS actually an agent of the Russian government, that it would be illegal under that clause to obscure the meeting on government disclosure forms?</quote> Doesn't even matter until it is proven that she is. Still waiting for these answers, btw: <cite>Vlado posted...</cite> <quote>Again, how do you comment on her anti-Trump facebook posts? Why does Putin send someone to Trump who offers nothing of use?</quote> --- Blitzball fan? Try Captain Tsubasa II (in English) for NES! Best game reviews: http://betweenlifeandgames.com</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1