LogFAQs > #977007991

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, Database 12 ( 11.2023-? ), Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicThe problem with MCU's Kang the Conqueror
Akagami_Shanks
11/03/23 7:56:21 AM
#24:


bfslick50 posted...
He doesn't but they should be more strategic with how they use him. Thanos was the guy behind the antagonist not the one losing to the heroes. In Multiverse of Madness one of the worlds they were passing through could've been controlled by Kang. Not someone to defeat, just as someone powerful that's scene. In Antman, they should've gone for the setback instead of the defeat. If Antman was the one to break his device and trap him in the quantum realm instead of the mom. That way at the end he's threateningly starting to build an army in the quantum world instead of being dead. They tried to use the Council of Kangs to make him still threatening but it's not the same. It's too much. If the Council is assembling an army of Kangs then shouldn't the "attack" be happening next installment?
the threat is also extremely vague

what are they threatened by? Ant Man? Did they really need an entire army to stop Ant Man? Are they no longer attempting to destroy each other? Do they need all these resources for just one "branch"?

---
yes
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1