LogFAQs > #976928989

Antiyonder posted...

@Garabandal

Yea, thanks.

I felt more comfortable discussing the issue in regards to predatory behavior, but the concern about awkwardness I had to wing it.

It's like I take people at their word that being gay isn't a choice, but:
A. I lack the insight to feel qualified to tackle that aspect. And....

B. I would say even if otherwise, that shouldn't be a factor for ban.

I mean, do you choose who you are attracted to or not attracted to? Theres your insight right there, regardless of your sexual orientation.

Heterosexual is a sexual orientation, too!

So you dont have to take gay people at their word anymore than someone has to take your word that youre straight (or asexual.)

And if you want to make an argument for choice, that is possible, however the problem inherent is you automatically open the door for people to equally argue it is a wrong or bad choice. This is an important facet.