LogFAQs > #976320330

I didn't go into the actual thread, however based off their defense in a thread they made protesting the deletion of the thread, they claimed they were doing the opposite of promoting the creation of AI child porn or at least claiming they personally didn't want it.

So it sounds like they were doing an AI version of wondering if allowing written cp stories would reduce actual pedophilia, which is an actual debate that has happened throughout recent history (SVU even has an episode based off this debate). With the other side of course being that allowing pedos to indulge in those fantasies encourages them to enact on those desires. There have been similar arguments in regards to rape porn.

Like I said, I didn't go into the actual original thread, so I'm mostly working off assumptions here as Mc_Same is currently warned and can't provide further context beyond their post in that protest thread and the fact that they've never come off as pro-pedo or as an apologist.

Anybody who was in the original thread and wants to comment on the accuracy of my assessment is welcomed to.