LogFAQs > #975855055

Back before I began blocking a variety of accounts from a few people, I don't recall Ulti caring about who blocked him when he made CSAD-topics. It was my belief that was one of his ways to get people to unblock him, by leveraging a popular thread away from accounts that blocked him so he could have their attention again. Similar thing with all the accounts he uses -- he has historically wanted our attention while getting away with his bad behavior.

As somebody that used to defend his right to speak up and have debates in the Politics Containment topics (which felt like extensions of the previous patience often given to him in other years-long periods of wack behavior toward people he claims he cares about, beginning with the early days/years of lol x-stats)...he was acting in bad faith for over a decade. That's exhausting, and people are allowed to block and ban him. Ulti had three good years, and ever since then it has been hard to trust him or see when the benefit of the doubt succeeded with him.

People shouldn't be asking Emerald to unblock him, do work for him, and entertain him. Does Ulti have a history of doing the same that I don't know about -- being considerate to the people he's blocking or people blocking him that I'm not aware of?

By general experience with Ulti, Emerald sounds plenty justified. ZeroSig's compromise was fair, but I still don't blame Emerald.

This has now gone from Emerald to ZeroSig handing it off to Ulti though, right? I get that it's better for Ulti to run something fun than nobody run something fun, as a principle, and I get giving it to a long-time player. It still strikes me as a bad idea, but it's not my game.

Some of ya'll probably know more about Ulti's behaviors in recent years. Has he really changed much in the past, say, five years?