LogFAQs > #975471353

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, Database 12 ( 11.2023-? ), Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	This Sound of Freedom crap is hilarious.
adjl 08/15/23 6:08:04 PM #193:	LELuMADuRUSTLED posted... Lol, so now you're trying to litigate friendships too, now. I'm sure this lady will be devastated to learn she was never actually friends with this guy. Maybe she was, maybe she wasn't, but the red flags for grooming definitely call any subjective account into question. LELuMADuRUSTLED posted... I'm just reminding you there's nothing you and yours can do about this. And yet you're fighting tooth and nail against the idea that he should be held accountable for the apparent conflict of interests, and trying to present the law as somehow justifying you not having a problem with an adult counsellor dating one of his underage students. LELuMADuRUSTLED posted... Well that doesn't sound well-defined or precise at all, does it. But so basically, you think the legal age to marry should be like 20-22 at least, then? I think it's a bad idea to marry before you've had enough life experience to know for certain what you want out of life, but that's distinct from wanting it to be illegal. There is, however, a world of difference between a couple of high school students getting married straight out of high school (or a similar close-in-age situation) and an adult getting married to a student with whom he should not have been romantically involved in any way as soon as she graduated. The former isn't a great idea, but there's nothing inherent in the relationship that suggests it isn't consensual and healthy. The latter carries all sorts of red flags for grooming and other potential abuse. LELuMADuRUSTLED posted... Unlike your bizarre fixation on litigating a now 10-years-old relationship? Well, yeah. People who are well out of high school shouldn't be picking up high school students, whether it happened two weeks ago or 40 years ago. That goes even more so for people in a position of power over those students. LELuMADuRUSTLED posted... And you don't need to attack him. I'll attack any professional that initiates a romantic relationship with somebody they're supposed to be advising. I'll attack anyone well out of high school initiating a romantic relationship with a high school student. Combine the two, and my ire is a given. By every available piece of information, dude's a creep, and I'm happy to treat him accordingly. I don't understand why you have a problem with that assessment. --- This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts. <cite>adjl posted [p:975471353] in This Sound... [t:80510356]...</cite> <quote>LELuMADuRUSTLED posted... </cite><quote>Lol, so now you're trying to litigate friendships too, now. I'm sure this lady will be devastated to learn she was never actually friends with this guy.</quote>Maybe she was, maybe she wasn't, but the red flags for grooming definitely call any subjective account into question.LELuMADuRUSTLED posted... </cite><quote>I'm just reminding you there's nothing you and yours can do about this.</quote>And yet you're fighting tooth and nail against the idea that he should be held accountable for the apparent conflict of interests, and trying to present the law as somehow justifying you not having a problem with an adult counsellor dating one of his underage students.LELuMADuRUSTLED posted... </cite><quote>Well that doesn't sound well-defined or precise at all, does it. But so basically, you think the legal age to marry should be like 20-22 at least, then?</quote>I think it's a bad idea to marry before you've had enough life experience to know for certain what you want out of life, but that's distinct from wanting it to be illegal. There is, however, a world of difference between a couple of high school students getting married straight out of high school (or a similar close-in-age situation) and an adult getting married to a student with whom he should not have been romantically involved in any way as soon as she graduated. The former isn't a great idea, but there's nothing inherent in the relationship that suggests it isn't consensual and healthy. The latter carries all sorts of red flags for grooming and other potential abuse.LELuMADuRUSTLED posted... </cite><quote>Unlike your bizarre fixation on litigating a now 10-years-old relationship?</quote>Well, yeah. People who are well out of high school shouldn't be picking up high school students, whether it happened two weeks ago or 40 years ago. That goes even more so for people in a position of power over those students.LELuMADuRUSTLED posted... </cite><quote>And you don't need to attack him.</quote>I'll attack any professional that initiates a romantic relationship with somebody they're supposed to be advising. I'll attack anyone well out of high school initiating a romantic relationship with a high school student. Combine the two, and my ire is a given. By every available piece of information, dude's a creep, and I'm happy to treat him accordingly. I don't understand why you have a problem with that assessment. --- This is my signature. It exists to keep people from skipping the last line of my posts.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1