LogFAQs > #974924860

BobbaDukes posted...

Are you seriously proposing that there are no scenarios in which a heinous person got off the hook for their horrible crimes, and then faced the wrath of the victims loved ones?

Now, I know you can't reply on this account, but I thought I'd take a second to tell you that you're moving the goalposts.

You were challenged to name a time when it's acceptable to commit vigilantism instead of letting due process take its course.

You named the assault of a family member. There was never "off the hook" as if due process had failed in your original example. You were specific that you didn't care if a jury could or would convict, and that you would just do it first, anyway, because you "100% knew."

For when/if you come back:
- Don't move goalposts, it's bad debating
- a jury acquittal still does not justify vigilantism