LogFAQs > #974781787

ForsakenHermit posted...

Did you miss the part where Costner offered to pay for all the kids expenses?

Nobody's arguing that Costner should be off the hook completely with his kids. Just that children don't need hundreds of thousands of dollars spent on them every single month.You're pushing a strawman argument and it's making you look foolish, stop.

You get that the kids expenses was on top of his 50k offer right? Which would likely put it in the range the court decided on anyway?

These aren't kids who are getting clothes from Walmart in a public school. The expenses are expensive because of who he is and who they are.

Hell the article says she also needs to pay 50% of those expenses so he might be considered the winner over her considering she's getting half of what she was asking for.