LogFAQs > #974610477

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, Database 12 ( 11.2023-? ), Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicThe truth about Pit Bulls
hockeybub89
07/03/23 11:32:42 PM
#243:


Taharqa_ posted...
Well if we're going to judge dogs by what they could potentially do then there are dozens of breeds that are larger and far more powerful than Pit Bulls, and most of them are traditional guardian breeds with human aggression bred in. It's just that people don't own those breeds as much as Pits so they're nowhere near as numerous. Any dog over a certain size has the capacity to do damage, everybody may as well have Pugs if we're worried about potential here. The first face transplant was the result of a Lab attack.
Well pugs have to be ended too because of their health problems.

But I guess humans selectively breeding animals for ownership is only immoral when it is suggested to stop doing so, but not when we're making sickly breeds just because we fucking can.

You shouldn't be allowed to domesticate any hippo either, and I really couldn't give less of a fuck about how responsible theoretical hippo owners should be, or how most hippos will never kill anyone. Sorry that I hate animals or whatever. Own a pet that can't easily kill any human if it has a bad day and decides to go back to its roots.

I wish pit bull fanboys cared as much about humans as they do some motherfucking dogs that humans literally manipulated nature to create for their own use. The literal idea of domestication is extremely immoral if we're going to apply human moral values to animals consistently, yet these topics are always full of people saying how cruel it is to not let them selectively breed certain animals for ownership.

---
http://card.psnprofiles.com/1/NIR_Hockey.png
he/him/they/them
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1