LogFAQs > #974600385

AP3Brain posted...

It isn't outrageous. They just have a collection of actual studies. You can pretend that research wasn't actually done I guess?

Here is the direct link to the study. Want to ignore this as well?
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34100808/

I never said the study was wrong. Those sites take studies and cherry-pick stats to fit their narratives. It goes both ways.

The anti pit sites will take the numbers and say "SEE THE MOST BITES WE NEED TO BAN THEM!!!" and the pro ones will take the studies that say the breed isnt bad "SEE PITBULLS ARENT DANGEROUS WE SHOULD LOVE THEM NO MATTER WHAT!!"

the issue at hand is that Pits are the most owned dog in the US and why are there so many injuries with them? Multiple studies have come out and said that its not the breed but ownership of the dog. So what do we need to do to make sure these dogs get into the homes of people who can take care of them and train them properly?

Then what can we do to make sure a different breed isn't put through the same issues? Banning breeds has been proven not to work. Bites dont decrease and another breed takes it place. Bad owners create bad dogs. I watched my dad ruin his dog