LogFAQs > #974595912

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12257079/Pet-poodle-mauled-dog-owner-bitten-Staffy-attack-Spearwood-Perth.html

poodle mauled, pet owner mauled in the face

https://kfor.com/news/local/woman-hurt-dog-killed-in-vicious-dog-attack/

pet killed, owner mauled

https://www.cbsnews.com/pittsburgh/news/2-children-attacked-dog-hopewell-township/

2 11 year olds mauled

https://www.fox19.com/2023/06/14/west-chester-dog-attack-2-hospitalized-dog-owners-arm-severed/

2 mauled, one has arm severed from body

https://au.news.yahoo.com/bride-dog-mauled-unprovoked-attack-wedding-231917985.html

bride and her pet mauled before wedding

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2023/06/22/rockport-dog-attack-texas-man-mauled-to-death/70342321007/

man mauled to death in the street

what's the common thread here? well yes, put bulls, but also these all happened within the last month. these also aren't all of them, i just get kind of sick after a while. pit bulls are responsible for more maulings and fatal accidents than the other 9 dogs in the top 10 put together. they were bred for fights, tenacity, and gameness. the breed is inherently dangerous, which is why there is breed specific legislation in almost every developed country on the planet. there is zero argument that can be brokered against these facts, except for the wonderful anecdotal "all the pits i met were so nice!" or "its the owner not the dog!" to make an analogy this board might understand, imagine if guns were sentient and actually could kill people, and an appreciable percentage were game to do so. now that's an argument for gun control if i ever heard one.