LogFAQs > #974024745

Im kinda torn about season3. Id like to watch how the story unfolds in the show but losing Henry Cavill to creative differences of the source material has my doubts on the entire series.

Yeah the games introduced me to the witcher and its adaptation from the books is nice. What many of us dont get is the videogames' adaptation of the witcher from the books is so good that it re-invigorated the series interests to everybody around the world. The videogames used the books to build such great game of the year content. Sure the videogame interaction is maybe challenging but the games' story and game world visuals, interactions, and stories (quests) is immersive enough to seek further details into books for a few of us (i started reading the books and have the first 3 books). CDProjekt knew the books content and used it in their games, taking characters into another level. Taking creative, adaptive ways to convey their stories in the games. Witcher 2 & then witcher 3 left fans wanting more.

Some writers have expressed how poorly the witcher is written and the tv adaption creative decisions has some of us wondering... whats going on?

Season 1 took the 1st book's approach of introducing us to the world of the witcher. It was acceptable. Short stories of characters, settings, & locations. Season 2 went further into the witcher and gave the audience more to details about the world. However, the shows direction divided many fans of the series. Season3 seems to be even more story details and new threats immerging from seemingly outta nowhere.