LogFAQs > #971910068

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, Database 11 ( 12.2022-11.2023 ), DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Realistically: girls would wear bigger armor for their boobs and not boob armor?
ellis123 03/02/23 3:16:49 PM #21:	KayEm posted... It's known that men had dick armour. https://preview.redd.it/4r6vpak5clz51.jpg?auto=webp&s=f8f1f8267436e7297032571797b9e0f9a7166b35 There's absolutely zero chance that women wouldn't have boob armour. Women would be burned at the stake for heresy/witchcraft for wearing armor. Historical precedent is not how to go about this. --- "A shouted order to do something of dubious morality with an unpredictable outcome? Thweeet!" My FC is in my profile. <cite>ellis123 posted [p:971910068] in Realistica... [t:80366187]...</cite> <quote>KayEm posted... </cite><quote>It's known that men had dick armour.https://preview.redd.it/4r6vpak5clz51.jpg?auto=webp&s=f8f1f8267436e7297032571797b9e0f9a7166b35There's absolutely zero chance that women wouldn't have boob armour.</quote>Women would be burned at the stake for heresy/witchcraft for wearing armor. Historical precedent is not how to go about this. --- "A shouted order to do something of dubious morality with an unpredictable outcome? Thweeet!"My FC is in my profile.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1