LogFAQs > #971391165

also, difficulty aside, I think its easier to just be sort of numb to Nestle or any other big corporations bad acts.
Like its basically impossible to exist in our society without giving money to some corporation thats exploiting people somewhere, and I guess it assuages some of that guilt to just write it off as the systems fault instead of taking personal responsibility for choosing to give money to Nestle or whoever else.

but JK Rowlings just one lady, and her actions are more visible and personal to people + they arent standard capitalism exploitation. Similarly thats why there was a very visible movement to boycott Chik-Fil-A for funding anti-gay organizations. Its not just about being bad, its about being bad in a nonstandard way that cant be written off as the cost of doing business.