LogFAQs > #969498161

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, Database 11 ( 12.2022-11.2023 ), DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicGaming pet peeves?
LinkPizza
11/17/22 3:40:14 PM
#135:


darkknight109 posted...
I understand that, but whether or not they're playable doesn't really factor into the question of that warranting extra payment on behalf of the end-user.

Whether or not the unit is playable in a specific version of Fates is a single variable in the code that could be switched on or off at a whim. It's not like the playable characters from Birthright are completely absent from Conquest or vice versa; the data is all there, because all of the characters were designed together and used - as allies, enemies, or both - in all three versions of the game. Since that data is already in the files, it doesn't seem to be a great justification for asking for more money.

I would think it warrant extra payment, tbh Different character has different stats, and play differently. Even just switching the characters on their own would change the game since you would have to play it completely different Just because it could be easily changed doesnt really seem to matter. The fact is they arent playable in all versions. Due to some characters being playable, with others not being playable, it really changes the game quite a bit Especially in a game like Fire Emblem

And while I understand they arent absent, that doesnt really matter. All that really matters is if they are playable So, I dont really see why they wouldnt ask for more money. In the end, they are still completely different games. Just games with the same characters. Thats like say in g you should charge for a sequel because it has the same characters from the first game

---
Official King of Kings
Switch FC: 7216-4417-4511 Add Me because I'll probably add you. I'm probably the LinkPizza you'll see around.
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1