LogFAQs > #969348218

Speaking as someone who doesnt really care that much for Michael meyers as a character, it was an incredibly stupid idea. The first two movies are sequential and back to back in their setting, and the second one immensely raises the tension and stakes whether you liked it or not. The third then completely throws that out the window and zooms ahead several years to tell a strange poorly concocted interpersonal drama that has very little to do with the first two movies plots. They get like 90% of the way through the movie then remembers people want a conclusion to the Michael stuff so they kill the Corey story stone dead and hamfistedly shove in a final confrontation

Its such a bizarre idea to try to get all contemplative and experimental in the final act of a very straightforward story, but I could forgive it if I found any of the Corey shit interesting. I dont though, which is the final nail in the coffin. If DGG wanted to tell a story where Michael is like a weird metaphysical idea of fear that corrupts peoples lives he shouldnt have made two straightforward slasher movies to preface it