LogFAQs > #967044630

UltimaterializerX posted...

If the game comes down to whether or not Corrik is telling the truth, then were better off skipping to that part and just killing Stu.

Because it is possible that Corrik is Scum and is just pocket bussing SBell. That is the argument here. And a mislynch of SBell means we lynch Corrik means we have nothing after that.

I am providing what I think is the most airtight plan. If people don't want to go with it and go for lynching, then I won't argue too hard against it. I've put in loads of effort into this game where I have had very little fun. I will fully admit I haven't had a good game (unless I was just right about Ctes and Hb in which case fuck me). I should have fought against Plum's lynch. I should have not been playing XBC3 at yesterday's deadline and noticed when Isquen claimed for real, as well as trusting my earlier read on him.

I was sad when I learned I was poisoned. I wished I'd have just been outright killed instead. But I've put in the legwork on this day, and even in a game where I wouldn't say I've done well at all, I can at least die knowing I tried.

I fully expect to roll my eyes when I get informed on death, and that's okay. Go with the Masterplan(tm) if you want to follow a by-the-numbers airtight plan for solving the game. Go for SBell or Death if you trust Corrik implicitly.

Hbthebattle posted...

What if Scum has another EK in their pocket?

Gambler gun on D2.
Poison on D3.
I feel pretty strongly that EK's are the anti-claim mechanic. And whatever's next is weaker than a poison.

Leafeon13N posted...

I dont know that i like the idea of pretending we can role madness the game over.

Because lots of things imply this game is screwy and yet we haven't had anything screwy flip that wasn't redacted.

Role madness doesn't necessarily mean "these are absolutely crazy roles", it means Chris put a lot of power into the game and didn't worry completely about balance.