LogFAQs > #966069455

SteamDeck462 posted...

It had to have been more than just 'cheering', no way the site staff would be so petty to suspend someone for difference of political opinion.

It was just him cheering. I think he said something like it was about time it was struck down or something. It was a fairly short post with him being very pro Supreme Court.

I could see how you could say it was him fishing for negative responses. I mean, it was pretty borderline. Its not something Id expect to see overturned simply because it could be viewed as trolling, even if it wasnt. But there was certainly nothing ban worthy in it like Duran is suggesting.