LogFAQs > #965891375

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, Database 10 ( 02.17.2022-12-01-2022 ), DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Johnny Depp vs. Amber Heard Aftermath
PrivateBiscuit1 06/17/22 12:56:23 PM #137:	red sox 777 posted... I mean if she was advising her clients before this case that they could make public accusations with no risk of a lawsuit, which I very much doubt she was doing, that was bad advice. This was a trial court decision; no legal precedents were set. The jury applied existing precedent to the evidence presented. You got it in one. Let's look at another so called legal professional trying to fearmonger. https://twitter.com/mldauber/status/1532374892879917060?s=20&t=1fBGYY2R0T1sGw-Wg3fW6w https://twitter.com/mldauber/status/1532377393553215489?s=20&t=1fBGYY2R0T1sGw-Wg3fW6w And in another tweet calling Depp's lawyer a "pick me girl". Stanford Law Professor, btw, teaching women. These people are not to be taken seriously. --- I stream sometimes. Check it out! www.twitch.tv/heroicbiz/ <cite>PrivateBiscuit1 posted [p:965891375] in Johnny Dep... [t:80057353]...</cite> <quote>red sox 777 posted... </cite> <quote>I mean if she was advising her clients before this case that they could make public accusations with no risk of a lawsuit, which I very much doubt she was doing, that was bad advice. This was a trial court decision; no legal precedents were set. The jury applied existing precedent to the evidence presented.</quote>You got it in one. Let's look at another so called legal professional trying to fearmonger. https://twitter.com/mldauber/status/1532374892879917060?s=20&t=1fBGYY2R0T1sGw-Wg3fW6w https://twitter.com/mldauber/status/1532377393553215489?s=20&t=1fBGYY2R0T1sGw-Wg3fW6w And in another tweet calling Depp's lawyer a "pick me girl". Stanford Law Professor, btw, teaching women. These people are not to be taken seriously. --- I stream sometimes. Check it out! www.twitch.tv/heroicbiz/</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1