LogFAQs > #965881906

ChaosTonyV4 posted...

lol got it, you want to act stupid like those posts werent entertaining the possibility.

okay tony

ChaosTonyV4 posted...

lol yeah ok dude, its all a conspiracy by Heards lawyers, you got it.

Also you dont seem willing to touch the crux of the argument? I very specifically am saying the opposite of oh just some woman who lost a court case. I said Heard is just some woman while everything around it has massive implicationsthats my argument.

edit: in an attempt to snap you out of this reflex you have and respond logically and honestly, let me state I think Amber writing that article with the ACLUs help and attempting to make the fight against domestic violence about herself was fucking stupid, awful, and will hurt victims of abuseparticularly women.

Are you insane? That is LITERALLY WHAT THEY ARE SAYING. You are saying the same things her and her team are saying. You very specifically DID say "Some woman lost a court case" to try and make it seem like it was less of a big deal than it was to drive home this dumb narrative of "No woman will ever speak out now!"

ChaosTonyV4 posted...

Nah dude, just like Rittenhouse, you seem genuinely incapable of taking big picture criticisms of situations as anything but direct attacks.

Im not talking about people CARING about the case, and I suspect you actually know that.

Im talking about the people watching court cases and being like I love this shit, I hope it doesnt end and I cant wait to cheer for my team! Im talking about people from Day 1, hell, before Day 1 of the case sharing memes about domestic abuse. About sex toy makers creating limited edition dildos of liquor bottles.

You know, objectively heinous shit that very specifically does not help victims of domestic violence. Considered that, or are you gonna make another sweeping statement that literally only sunshine and rainbows are possible?

You mean when you kept coming at me with Rittenhouse stuff when you very clearly didn't know about any of the facts of the case and I had to continually correct you? Yeah, I should have taken that criticism from the guy who took information from such reliable news sources that claimed he only shot and killed black people and fired 60 rounds into a crowd or any other place you got your very incorrect and bias information from. And while I was keeping people informed you were going "I don't think we should be getting a truthful summary of anything anymore. It seems unnecessary" when it's easy to ignore if you didn't want to see it.

But Christ alive who cares about Rittenhouse stuff anymore. It's been over.

And news flash Tony: Shitty people will do and say shitty things about literally every situation. There will always be bad faith actors in every situation. That's just how it is on the vast world of the internet, but you're just coming around in a topic where people are discussing the thing and going "Wowee people sure do care too much about this like it's a sports team" with no further context. People are impassioned about something like this because it hits close to a lot of people. Don't come into a topic where people DO care about it and make a sweeping statement like this and expect anyone to assume you mean anything but any of the people who are in said topic and do care.