LogFAQs > #965259927

I thought I said this earlier, but I guess I didn't post it.

D1 Lea and D3 Lea feel like completely different people. D1 Lea was full of fluff, latched on to flimsy arguments, and did nothing noteworthy. But that interaction with Chris regarding Arti's motives in the last topic was, for lack of a better term, awesome. I don't agree with the conclusion of her argument (that Arti didn't have a reason to recklessly claim as scum), but I thought she argued her case well and the reasoning was good. I might have entertained the same perspective if not for Death's conclusion.

Like, yeah, town is more often than not suboptimal, so expecting optimal play from a townie and suspecting them for it may not be reasonable. That's a platform I can understand. I still think Chris's suspicions of how Arti reacted to Corrik's fake scan and justification for choosing Ulti have weight to them, but last game, we did have a cop place their inno scan at the top of their scum list (sorry for always bringing that up!). So it makes sense to expect town to royally screw up more often than scum would, especially in such a blatant manner as this one.

Her argument felt like a genuine, well-constructed stance rather than BS for the sake of earning town points. Perhaps that's just how she plays as scum and is just finally waking up, but it's a stark contrast compared to D1. It makes me feel way better about Lea, though I'm not ready to take her off my scum list entirely yet.

Though in hindsight, perhaps such a vehement defense of Arti may be a scumbuddy trying to deceive Chris in order to possibly save Arti from a lynch. Idk, that's plausible, but I'm gonna err on the side of a genuine and well-meaning defense just due to the absurdity of the situation.