LogFAQs > #965197316

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, Database 10 ( 02.17.2022-12-01-2022 ), DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Chip & Dale Rescue Rangers (spoilers)
WazzupGenius00 05/21/22 7:20:02 AM #21:	PrivateBiscuit1 posted... I'm actually really glad that Sega is willing to let Ugly Sonic be a thing like this. They could very easily be bitter about it and embarrassed but after the success of both movies I guess they're happy to let it be a joke since they made the right choice to change it. I read that Sonic/SEGA/Paramount are not mentioned in the credits as a licensed appearance while other cameos from characters Disney doesnt own are If thats the case, this could mean the legally-distinct parody character Ugly Sonic is owned by Disney, in a sort of Dumb Starbucks situation --- http://i.imgur.com/k0v0z3q.gif <cite>WazzupGenius00 posted [p:965197316] in Chip &... [t:80027539]...</cite> <quote>PrivateBiscuit1 posted... </cite> <quote>I'm actually really glad that Sega is willing to let Ugly Sonic be a thing like this. They could very easily be bitter about it and embarrassed but after the success of both movies I guess they're happy to let it be a joke since they made the right choice to change it.</quote>I read that Sonic/SEGA/Paramount are not mentioned in the credits as a licensed appearance while other cameos from characters Disney doesnt own are If thats the case, this could mean the legally-distinct parody character Ugly Sonic is owned by Disney, in a sort of Dumb Starbucks situation --- http://i.imgur.com/k0v0z3q.gif</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1