LogFAQs > #963603406

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, Database 10 ( 02.17.2022-12-01-2022 ), DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicA fact many refuse to accept as true:
joe40001
03/20/22 8:56:30 AM
#30:


BalanceLost posted...
A person who guaranteed has no STDs/STIs is of course the safety sex partner of all, but that doesnt change my statement that an HIV-positive person on successful treatment is one of the safest sex partners. Because if we look at this from a real world perspective, which is what safe sex needs to be based on, the risk is higher if you have sex with a person who regularly OR just sometimes have new sexual partners and think they are negative because a test they took last week said so but they took the test less than 3 months after their last sexual encounter. Because it could be a false negative since enough time hasnt gone by for the test to detect HIV, but the person could be infectious by the time you sleep with them. A person could have only had sex once some time ago, and gotten infected without knowing and they took a test too soon or not at all, and then they infect their second partner since both think all is well and there is no need for a condom.

I don't know what some of those terms means.

But "one of the safest" implies like top 10% maybe, and I'd imagine well over 10% of people don't have STDs. So they wouldn't be "one of the safest" because they'd be less safe than everybody who didn't have an STD.

---
"joe is attractive and quite the brilliant poster" - Seiichi Omori
http://i.imgur.com/TheGsZ9.gif
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1