LogFAQs > #886422098

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	The story of Moses parting the sea was BS. It was similar to what Irma did...
K181 09/11/17 5:26:38 PM #40:	DawkinsNumber4 posted... K181 posted... No, but I am saying that attempting to scientifically prove the conditions of a biblical miracle is inherently unscientific as you're using biased sources as proof and don't have remotely enough information at hand, not to mention that doing so often would assume utter stupidity on the people there to witness it if it did happen (Jesus was actually on ice and nobody noticed) or was the result of an unfathomable number of coincidences all taking place at once (this). Much easier and more scientific to state that the miracle stories were inflated or made up if your goal is to disprove the divine nature of them. "No, but I am saying that attempting to scientifically prove the conditions of a biblical miracle is inherently unscientific as you're using biased sources as proof and don't have remotely enough information at hand, not to mention that doing so often would assume utter stupidity on the people there to witness it if it did happen (Jesus was actually on ice and nobody noticed) or was the result of an unfathomable number of coincidences all taking place at once (this). Much easier and more scientific to state that the miracle stories were inflated or made up if your goal is to disprove the divine nature of them." "or was the result of an unfathomable number of coincidences all taking place at once (this)" This sounds more like a great plan than a coincidence. ... what? So you quoted me twice and then a part of it a third time and then made a nonsensical statement. --- The poster formerly known as Kakarot181: July 2, 2002 - March 14, 2012. Irregardless, for all intensive purposes, I could care less. <cite>K181 posted [p:886422098] in The story ... [t:75764332]...</cite> <quote><cite>DawkinsNumber4 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>K181 posted...</cite> <quote>No, but I am saying that attempting to scientifically prove the conditions of a biblical miracle is inherently unscientific as you're using biased sources as proof and don't have remotely enough information at hand, not to mention that doing so often would assume utter stupidity on the people there to witness it if it did happen (Jesus was actually on ice and nobody noticed) or was the result of an unfathomable number of coincidences all taking place at once (this). Much easier and more scientific to state that the miracle stories were inflated or made up if your goal is to disprove the divine nature of them.</quote> "No, but I am saying that attempting to scientifically prove the conditions of a biblical miracle is inherently unscientific as you're using biased sources as proof and don't have remotely enough information at hand, not to mention that doing so often would assume utter stupidity on the people there to witness it if it did happen (Jesus was actually on ice and nobody noticed) or was the result of an unfathomable number of coincidences all taking place at once (this). Much easier and more scientific to state that the miracle stories were inflated or made up if your goal is to disprove the divine nature of them." "or was the result of an unfathomable number of coincidences all taking place at once (this)" This sounds more like a great plan than a coincidence.</quote> ... what? So you quoted me twice and then a part of it a third time and then made a nonsensical statement. --- The poster formerly known as Kakarot181: July 2, 2002 - March 14, 2012. Irregardless, for all intensive purposes, I could care less.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1