| Topic List | Page List: 1 |
|---|---|
| Topic | Politics Containment Topic 131: Deferred Action by Childish Administration |
| Corrik 09/09/17 11:58:08 AM #489: | Jakyl25 posted... So you basically have no idea what actually happened Unless utah has different laws (which i am sure with all your googling you are an expert at because you know how you all are here acting like yinz are), in a fatal crash they check alcohol content of everyone involved. In PA, even if someone else wrecks into you totally at their own fault and you fail for bac then you are at fault and charged with a DUI. Now, this normally never plays out in this way because you are both concious, if the cops are called they can usually see if you are intoxicated, and this isn't necessary. In this case, the person was not concious so it was impossible to make a judgment on intoxication. A death occured in a crash which usually triggers testing on all parties. I mean, yeah, you can argue he wasn't a suspect but they are supposed to rule out intoxication being involved which makes him a suspect in my mind. You don't invoke implied consent on the person to order blood if they are not suspected of intoxication, whether you believe they are or not. He was a suspect. He wanted to draw his blood to remove him being a suspect of a crime from the equation. So, I dunno unless Utah has some weird laws I see no way he wasn't a suspect. --- LoL ID = imajericho XBL GT = Corrik ... Copied to Clipboard! |
| Topic List | Page List: 1 |