LogFAQs > #885704736

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicThis 17 y/o Girl was treated like a SLUT because she DIDN'T wear a BRA!!!
Kyuubi4269
08/30/17 5:24:10 AM
#99:


acesxhigh posted...
Golden Road posted...
acesxhigh posted...
Telling someone who and what they should be sexually attracted to is kind of what homophobes do

If you're not promoting ephebophilia, then what are you doing there? It doesn't really matter that you didn't explicitly use that word, it's pretty clear what you meant by that sentence. We're not that stupid.

I'm not promoting anything except, what, freedom of thought? You can't honestly believe that an arbitrary "underage" law can dictate appropriate sexual attraction. When this girl is 18, 19, 20, she will probably look exactly the same but then she's not underage anymore so... it's okay then? Where's the logic here?

Ya, attraction is fine as long as awareness is kept on appropriateness of action. (btw, it's inappropriate to talk about it, nobody wants to hear that creepin'.)
---
RIP_Supa posted...
I've seen some stuff
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1