LogFAQs > #885498798

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicFree speech does not equal Hate speech
Zeus
08/26/17 6:05:57 PM
#67:


adjl posted...
There's literally an entire class of reference text devoted to English words that mean the same thing as other words, and a term to describe such words.


Similar to =/= Same

adjl posted...
And they typically don't, because that's how implications work. "Neo-" is only really necessary when you do actually need to differentiate them from the historical party. Most of the time, there isn't going to be any ambiguity for leaving it out.


There's a pretty massive ambiguity in leaving it out because it was a real political group and many of the values ascribed to Nazis weren't held by the ACTUAL Nazis since the organization also compromised just normal German soldiers. More importantly, the problem with Nazis wasn't merely a matter of they had racist beliefs but the fact that they were invading other nations which is something you far-leftists who know very little about history seem to forget.

adjl posted...
Nazis didn't really support socialism. Including "socialist" in the name was largely just an effort to attract younger, disenfranchised workers who liked the sound of it; the party itself was modeled pretty much entirely off of Italian fascism.


"We could solve a mystery / Or re-write history! / Ducktales, whoo ooh!"

Just because you don't like the fact that many of the most reprehensible regimes throughout history were either socialist or rooted in socialism -- because socialism, as a statist philosophy, lends itself very well to that sort of stuff -- doesn't stop their socialist connections.

adjl posted...
No, but it does mean they're assholes, and you should probably avoid hanging out with them if you want to be taken seriously.


Says the guy who outright supports BLM, Antifa, and other violent groups.

adjl posted...
It's hardly conclusive, but if somebody spends this much time resisting criticizing Nazis, that definitely suggests they actually like Nazis. Again, it's very simple to fix this. Pretty much everyone has an easy time saying "Nazis suck." Because, you know, Nazis suck. That is, unless you don't actually feel that Nazis suck, in which case you're sympathizing with Nazis, which - by definition - would make you a Nazi sympathizer.


Because they're not fucking Nazis. If I said that somebody wasn't gay, that doesn't magically make gay. If I said that somebody wasn't a murderer, that wouldn't make me a murderer. However, in batshit crazy land, pointing that somebody isn't a thing apparently makes somebody that thing which is why nobody in their right mind should want to live in batshit crazy land and every rational person should resist the spread of batshit crazy land by you and SJW supporters.

And, quite frankly, calling Neo-Nazis Nazis diminishes the terror of the original Nazis making them tamer which, if anything, literally makes you a Nazi sympathizer because you are cleaning up their image by relating them to objectively less horrifying people.
---
(\/)(\/)|-|
In Zeus We Trust: All Others Pay Cash
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1