LogFAQs > #884856402

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Iceland approaches 100% abortion rate for down syndrome
CountessRolab 08/15/17 11:02:47 PM #48:	ChromaticAngel posted... CountessRolab posted... Sad_Face posted... Is it going to be unethical to not have a designer baby then? Yes, absolutely. If the technology is available, you are a fool not to use it. not everything suboptimal is unethical. presumably designer babies won't be free. someone isn't unethical for deciding it won't fit into their budget. To be fair, I also think it is unethical to have a child if you are low-income. --- https://i.imgur.com/Ux7l21R.jpg <cite>CountessRolab posted [p:884856402] in Iceland ap... [t:75675253]...</cite> <quote><cite>ChromaticAngel posted...</cite> <quote><cite>CountessRolab posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Sad_Face posted...</cite> <quote> Is it going to be unethical to not have a designer baby then?</quote> Yes, absolutely. If the technology is available, you are a fool not to use it.</quote> not everything suboptimal is unethical. presumably designer babies won't be free. someone isn't unethical for deciding it won't fit into their budget.</quote> To be fair, I also think it is unethical to have a child if you are low-income. --- https://i.imgur.com/Ux7l21R.jpg</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1