LogFAQs > #884499888

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	I am full anti Trump but North Korea should be invaded ASAP
Dikitain 08/09/17 10:52:53 PM #15:	Cacciato posted... Dikitain posted... Cacciato posted... Dikitain posted... SushiSquid posted... The reason to not invade North Korea is because the entirety of Seoul will be destroyed immediately if you do. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seoul Apparently that's about 10 million people in the city, 26 million in the surrounding area. Are you cool with that? How? I mean yea it makes sense for North Korea to pick the capital city of their closest enemy as a target but how would North Korea destroy the "entirety" of Seoul? The south has people guarding the boarder, and any missiles are going to be noticed long before they hit their target (if they even do, North Korea hasn't even shown they can fire a missile far enough to hit Seoul). At best they will cause some serious damage, but no way will they entirely destroy Seoul. Do you not watch the news? That's not an answer. I'm just not understanding how you think they can't hit Seoul. I am not arguing that they can't hit Seoul, I am arguing that they can "entirely destroy" Seoul. Nothing outside of a hydrogen bomb can do that and North Korea certainly doesn't have one of those. --- I am a senior software engineer. If you see me post here, I am tired of writing TPS reports. <cite>Dikitain posted [p:884499888] in I am full ... [t:75654858]...</cite> <quote><cite>Cacciato posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Dikitain posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Cacciato posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Dikitain posted...</cite> <quote><cite>SushiSquid posted...</cite> <quote>The reason to not invade North Korea is because the entirety of Seoul will be destroyed immediately if you do. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seoul Apparently that's about 10 million people in the city, 26 million in the surrounding area. Are you cool with that?</quote> How? I mean yea it makes sense for North Korea to pick the capital city of their closest enemy as a target but how would North Korea destroy the "entirety" of Seoul? The south has people guarding the boarder, and any missiles are going to be noticed long before they hit their target (if they even do, North Korea hasn't even shown they can fire a missile far enough to hit Seoul). At best they will cause some serious damage, but no way will they entirely destroy Seoul.</quote> Do you not watch the news?</quote> That's not an answer.</quote> I'm just not understanding how you think they can't hit Seoul.</quote> I am not arguing that they can't hit Seoul, I am arguing that they can "entirely destroy" Seoul. Nothing outside of a hydrogen bomb can do that and North Korea certainly doesn't have one of those. --- I am a senior software engineer. If you see me post here, I am tired of writing TPS reports.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1