LogFAQs > #884045775

The problem is those dudes are taught that they should proposition women EVERYWHERE. This is bad already in bars where they think they should ask out every woman no matter what availability she is signaling, but it's CRITICALLY worse when at a professional conference where NO ONE is there for sex.

Just because someone isn't "there for" sex doesn't mean they won't agree to a date in the right set of circumstances. I thought we've gotten past this. There is no "wrong time" or "wrong place" for someone who is handsome and charismatic. And there is no "right time" or "right place" for the socially awkward nerd.

So long as the nerd believes he has a comparative advantage (something libertarians understand very well!) with libertarian women, it makes logical and rational sense for him to target libertarian women. And if libertarian women are ridiculously rare (which they are), he may never have a chance to approach so many ever again. He'd be stupid NOT to go after them!

Why would you NOT choose to do that, if you cared AT ALL about your community (libertarianism, games, whatever)?

You're really confused as to why libertarians are reluctant to subordinate their individual interests to those of a larger collective? Really?

As much as I oppose social shaming, I think it's the only solution that may actually work. Good luck convincing libertarians they need to sacrifice their own individual chances of happiness in order to better serve the needs of the collective, whether that collective is libertarianism (at least that's an ingroup for them), or women in general (which is an outgroup).

"If you try and hit on any women here we will make you unemployable" may be morally dastardly, but at least it would probably work.
---

SmartMuffin - Because anything less would be uncivilized - http://i.imgur.com/W66HUUy.jpg
http://dudewheresmyfreedom.com/