LogFAQs > #883424571

So, my immediate issue with this story and interpretation is that:

1: The source for this is an avowed pro-life website that suggests you sign a petition to defund Planned Parenthood, creating a conflict of interest with journalistic integrity and the biases of the website owner..

2: The website that RedState stole all this info from (lifenews) is self-referential. E.g, it does not provide external sources outside of deleted youtube videos. It claims that these videos were deleted , however, the videos states it was deleted for "violating terms of service", meaning it's very possible that the article writer is lying. There's no indication of false DMCA takedowns or coercion into removal by the video maker.

3: The videos that I could find of this are around 2 years old and are heavily edited, and we already had a rodeo where videos were deceptively edited (by Project Veritas) to accuse Planned Parenthood of something they didn't commit. I'm not totally certain, but these could even be the same videos reposted by other Youtube accounts.

Essentially: The nefarious spin on the story is likely a load of shit, because all parties reporting on this have a vested personal and financial interest in their opponents looking as bad as possible.
---

Enjoy movies and television? Check out my blog! I do reviews and analyses.
http://fictionrantreview.wordpress.com/ (The Force Awakens spoiler review up!)