LogFAQs > #882388938

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Politics Containment Topic 109: CNN is now TWMGNN
Peace___Frog 07/05/17 5:38:20 PM #162:	ChaosTonyV4 posted... No, because those naked pictures weren't posted publicly, they were stolen. If an actress anonymously CHOSE to post her own nudes, and then she gets identified somehow, yes that should be legal. His argument is that this guy didn't post his name, either, so it was similarly "stolen". It's an idiotic argument and equates apples to cinder blocks. --- ~Peaf~ <cite>Peace___Frog posted [p:882388938] in Politics C... [t:75533043]...</cite> <quote><cite>ChaosTonyV4 posted...</cite> <quote> No, because those naked pictures weren't posted publicly, they were stolen. If an actress anonymously CHOSE to post her own nudes, and then she gets identified somehow, yes that should be legal.</quote> His argument is that this guy didn't post his name, either, so it was similarly "stolen". It's an idiotic argument and equates apples to cinder blocks. --- ~Peaf~</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1