LogFAQs > #882069397

wolfy42 posted...

Honestly barely saw any resemblance between King's Running man and the movie. Much prefered the movie TBH, only think I read the short story ...maybe twice.

Yeah, the book was some hum-drum conspiracy thing which was so focused on making a social statement that it had almost no room for fun, save for the ending.

TheCyborgNinja posted...

wolfy42 posted...

Yeah, King until his accident made some masterpieces, he was a god of writing.

Never been a big fan of Koontz tbh, some of his stuff was alright, but I honestly can't remember any of it anymore.

I'm not one for fiction outside of horror anthologies, but I could never really read Stephen King. His writing style and my brain just aren't friends. He's probably the only author I have had this problem with. It's almost like reading something that has been translated to me.

I like his short stories, but most of his novels don't have enough of a payoff. Christine was okay, though, although I half prefer the film because the car was always evil in that version -- even killing somebody right in the factory while "Bad to the Bone" was playing.

In general, he writes in a pretty blue-collar way and, in a long of his stuff, he's overly fond of cultural references. The one big advantage is that so much of his stuff adapts well to film and mini-series.
---

(\/)(\/)|-|
In Zeus We Trust: All Others Pay Cash