LogFAQs > #880530553

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Name any "good" things Trump has done so far in office
Amputation 06/06/17 2:36:01 PM #31:	Darkman124 posted... KILBOTz posted... Darkman124 posted... KILBOTz posted... Telling NATO they need to pay for their shit was good. not telling them we were still committed to mutual defense when his own team wrote that into the speech was very very bad Agreed, I may be lowering the bar but sending the message to spend the agreed to amount I still stand behind. the 2014 agreement was nations not in compliance would work towards it over the next decade, not right away my perspective is "they are not in the forefront of development of air superiority or missile defense tech so why do we even give a shit what they spend" they exist as a place to put Aegis Ashore and base F-35s/F-22s It's actually impossible for most of the nations in NATO to spend 2% of their GNP on defense, they simply don't have the economy and funds for it These countries are not choosing to spend less on defense and have America pick up the slack, it's that they literally can't spend more Trump and Trumpettes do not understand this though --- Now Playing: Final Fantasy XV, Tokyo Mirage Sessions, BoTW, Bayonetta <cite>Amputation posted [p:880530553] in Name any &... [t:75426900]...</cite> <quote><cite>Darkman124 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KILBOTz posted...</cite> <quote><cite>Darkman124 posted...</cite> <quote><cite>KILBOTz posted...</cite> <quote>Telling NATO they need to pay for their shit was good.</quote> not telling them we were still committed to mutual defense when his own team wrote that into the speech was very very bad</quote> Agreed, I may be lowering the bar but sending the message to spend the agreed to amount I still stand behind.</quote> the 2014 agreement was nations not in compliance would work towards it over the next decade, not right away my perspective is "they are not in the forefront of development of air superiority or missile defense tech so why do we even give a shit what they spend" they exist as a place to put Aegis Ashore and base F-35s/F-22s</quote> It's actually impossible for most of the nations in NATO to spend 2% of their GNP on defense, they simply don't have the economy and funds for it These countries are not choosing to spend less on defense and have America pick up the slack, it's that they literally can't spend more Trump and Trumpettes do not understand this though --- Now Playing: Final Fantasy XV, Tokyo Mirage Sessions, BoTW, Bayonetta</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1