LogFAQs > #879250257

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Contest Stats and Discussion - Part 1273
Haste_2 05/17/17 12:26:05 AM #298:	1998's 73% on 1992 was flat out scary, but expected (at least, it should have been). I would think 1996 is a bit stronger than 1992. If 1997 can break 70% by the end, I might have to retract my "not a chance" statement about '97 > '98. But no matter how well 1997 does today, I couldn't call it the favorite for the championwhip. pjbasis posted... 98 isn't gonna be held under 70 until the finals You may be right. If 1994 is worth 54.75% on 1992, 1998 will hit 70% on 1994. Granted, there could have been SFF in '98 vs. '92. --- "Ah, a party! We haven't had one of those. It could be fun. So... what is a party?" "Well, you drink punch and eat CAKE! ...I think." <cite>Haste_2 posted [p:879250257] in Contest St... [t:75350694]...</cite> <quote>1998's 73% on 1992 was flat out scary, but expected (at least, it should have been). I would think 1996 is a bit stronger than 1992. If 1997 can break 70% by the end, I might have to retract my "not a chance" statement about '97 > '98. But no matter how well 1997 does today, I couldn't call it the favorite for the championwhip. <cite>pjbasis posted...</cite> <quote> 98 isn't gonna be held under 70 until the finals</quote> You may be right. If 1994 is worth 54.75% on 1992, 1998 will hit 70% on 1994. Granted, there could have been SFF in '98 vs. '92. --- "Ah, a party! We haven't had one of those. It could be fun. So... what is a party?" "Well, you drink punch and eat CAKE! ...I think."</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1