LogFAQs > #876122591

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Chrono Trigger Mafia Topic 9: All life begins with Nu and ends with Nu...
Lopen 03/29/17 2:43:38 PM #321:	bng_mmmk posted... bng_mmmk posted... neonreaper posted... hate to call out turbopuns but like, if you asked the game for their scum teams he would probably be unanimous no? See, I get this every game. Every game. I was the only player out of 19 who did not receive a single vote D1. There was only one day out of five that I received more than zero votes. I was voted twice in the entire game, and it was in the final minutes of a day which ended in a town/town lynch. I mean I know this town wasn't spectacular, but that's not my fault. My job description as mafia is not "don't get called scum", but "don't get lynched". One thing to add now that I'm back at a computer: Posted on the scumboard during the early hours of D2: My hope is I'll end up being that person who at the end everybody goes "Wow we all knew he was scum but nobody ever lynched him" It's a thing. There's a fine line between being on people's scum list and actually being voted. I'm the type of scum who flirts with that line constantly. I mean the problem with this game in particular is dowolf was probably the main player in the game that aggressively pushed for anyone, and he was scum. So not getting votes is really nothing to gloat about here. Only scum that got any votes of note was Ulti. You actually got more than igcd so maybe he's actually king. Granted, I don't know how past games have been, maybe there have been more active towns you've gotten this rep from. I'm just saying that in the face of those active towns I'm not convinced you wouldn't have been lynched here since you literally never left my scumlist since digesting the end of day 1, and VI can vouch for that. There were certainly reads I was wrong on-- like I thought Tony was more likely scum than not for example-- luckily by the time I would've pushed for it he was dead. I also was pretty sure red was scum for most of the game and was off on that. But none of the nonscum ever went above you on the suspicion hierarchy, which is telling. Even dowolf I had briefly put below red. It's not a random guess I happened to be right on in the end of the game that has me saying it was obvious to me-- it's like, glowing red sign for anyone who was paying attention to the end of day 1. And it was all made off of direct in game evidence, and votes, reasoning behind votes, not things like "gut" so I feel like it would be easy to build the case. prof was so close to getting something going, but he couldn't be assed to. Maybe you could shake someone actually pushing for you, but no one actually did such so I can't know based on this game. If you wanna point me to an archive of a game you felt was active and you still deftly avoided suspicion despite someone having a good case against you, I'd be happy to glance over it, but there are a lot of players who can avoid suspicion by not saying dumb things, particularly in a game where you've got se7en and eaed being dumb thing lightning rods. You seem to be implying there's some agenda or existing bias but I haven't actually followed any of these games you're referring to nor did I know you had that rep, so said bias doesn't actually exist here <_< --- No problem! This is a cute and pop genocide of love! <cite>Lopen posted [p:876122591] in Chrono Tri... [t:75170268]...</cite> <quote> <cite>bng_mmmk posted...</cite> <quote><cite>bng_mmmk posted...</cite> <quote><cite>neonreaper posted...</cite> <quote>hate to call out turbopuns but like, if you asked the game for their scum teams he would probably be unanimous no?</quote> See, I get this every game. Every game. I was the only player out of 19 who did not receive a single vote D1. There was only one day out of five that I received more than zero votes. I was voted twice in the entire game, and it was in the final minutes of a day which ended in a town/town lynch. I mean I know this town wasn't spectacular, but that's not my fault. My job description as mafia is not "don't get called scum", but "don't get lynched".</quote> One thing to add now that I'm back at a computer: Posted on the scumboard during the early hours of D2: My hope is I'll end up being that person who at the end everybody goes "Wow we all knew he was scum but nobody ever lynched him" It's a thing. There's a fine line between being on people's scum list and actually being voted. I'm the type of scum who flirts with that line constantly.</quote> I mean the problem with this game in particular is dowolf was probably the main player in the game that aggressively pushed for anyone, and he was scum. So not getting votes is really nothing to gloat about here. Only scum that got any votes of note was Ulti. You actually got more than igcd so maybe he's actually king. Granted, I don't know how past games have been, maybe there have been more active towns you've gotten this rep from. I'm just saying that in the face of those active towns I'm not convinced you wouldn't have been lynched here since you literally never left my scumlist since digesting the end of day 1, and VI can vouch for that. There were certainly reads I was wrong on-- like I thought Tony was more likely scum than not for example-- luckily by the time I would've pushed for it he was dead. I also was pretty sure red was scum for most of the game and was off on that. But none of the nonscum ever went above you on the suspicion hierarchy, which is telling. Even dowolf I had briefly put below red. It's not a random guess I happened to be right on in the end of the game that has me saying it was obvious to me-- it's like, glowing red sign for anyone who was paying attention to the end of day 1. And it was all made off of direct in game evidence, and votes, reasoning behind votes, not things like "gut" so I feel like it would be easy to build the case. prof was so close to getting something going, but he couldn't be assed to. Maybe you could shake someone actually pushing for you, but no one actually did such so I can't know based on this game. If you wanna point me to an archive of a game you felt was active and you still deftly avoided suspicion despite someone having a good case against you, I'd be happy to glance over it, but there are a lot of players who can avoid suspicion by not saying dumb things, particularly in a game where you've got se7en and eaed being dumb thing lightning rods. You seem to be implying there's some agenda or existing bias but I haven't actually followed any of these games you're referring to nor did I know you had that rep, so said bias doesn't actually exist here <_< --- No problem! This is a cute and pop genocide of love!</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1