LogFAQs > #874759104

Finished 2010 and then read your writeup for it and it seems like we're almost completely opposites about this one. While I still think it was only a mid level Rumble overall, the things I liked and disliked about it seem to completely differ from you. For starters, I can't stand CM Punk's shtick. I also don't like when the Rumble consistently has less than 4 people in it unless it's nearing the end. I mean, I don't want 15 or anything, but a nice 4-7 is good for me. This Rumble constantly had too few people in it.

On the positive side, I loved that Triple H stopped the flow of CM Punk, but then I like Triple H so...yea. Also, I know I said in my 2009 review that I generally hate it when teammates turn on each other because it makes no sense, in this case it's just Shawn being Shawn so that doesn't bother me at all. I also liked the fact that it it was not a heel that eliminated him because I feel like it added to his moment of disbelief and shock. Like, you feel sorry for him but at the same time it was a fair elimination and he just has to accept it.

Also, unlike 2009, I liked the winner this time. All in all, if it wasn't for the fact that so often there's 3 or less people I'd have put this above 2009, but that just bothers me for Rumbles.
---

1st Year OMG Link Always Wins. 2nd Year OMG FF7 Always Wins.
3rd Year OMG Link Always Wins. 2101st Year OMG CATS Always Wins.