LogFAQs > #874597060

LurkerFAQs, Active DB, Database 1 ( 03.09.2017-09.16.2017 ), DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Politics Containment Topic 76: Personal Attack Free Edition 2.0
KanzarisKelshen 03/07/17 6:05:32 PM #40:	red sox 777 posted... The product is good if it is good before you know whether you'll get sick or not. I agree that in principle, not denying coverage for preexisting conditions is antithetical to a free market solution. Hence I suggested it as an emergency bill, while a permanent solution is negotiated. But negotiated from a position of strength, where the insurance companies are the ones afraid for their future. It doesn't work that way Insurance companies have a warchest You f*** em over enough, they close up shop, fire all of their employees and start a new venture Net result is you've made 100k people lose their jobs and the CEOs and board members have not paid any price besides the minor inconvenience of 'gotta start a new enterprise', plus healthcare is less available to everybody The only way to hold the cards is if you can pin the people of a company down, specifically its top ranks. Which is unbelievably hard without straight up just ignoring law. If you have any suggestions for how congress can pull this off without being unconstitutional, we're all ears. --- Shine on, you crazy diamond. <cite>KanzarisKelshen posted [p:874597060] in Politics C... [t:75080819]...</cite> <quote><cite>red sox 777 posted...</cite> <quote>The product is good if it is good before you know whether you'll get sick or not. I agree that in principle, not denying coverage for preexisting conditions is antithetical to a free market solution. Hence I suggested it as an emergency bill, while a permanent solution is negotiated. But negotiated from a position of strength, where the insurance companies are the ones afraid for their future.</quote> It doesn't work that way Insurance companies have a warchest You f*** em over enough, they close up shop, fire all of their employees and start a new venture Net result is you've made 100k people lose their jobs and the CEOs and board members have not paid any price besides the minor inconvenience of 'gotta start a new enterprise', plus healthcare is less available to everybody The only way to hold the cards is if you can pin the people of a company down, specifically its top ranks. Which is unbelievably hard without straight up just ignoring law. If you have any suggestions for how congress can pull this off without being unconstitutional, we're all ears. --- Shine on, you crazy diamond.</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1