LogFAQs > #986433847

LurkerFAQs, Active Database ( 12.01.2023-present ), DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicJudge dismisses terrorism charges against Luigi
UnfairRepresent
09/16/25 3:10:09 PM
#113:


LightSnake posted...
Bro, there's no evidence he was planning a mass killing spree, you don't charge people based on "we can't be sure if you would've stopped" what is that.

I agree. I said so earlier. Speculating what happens in an alternate reality is silly

My point was "He only did one terrorist act before he was caught." doesn't mean he isn't a terrorist. It means he was caught after only 1 act.



Also, what is with you citing examples you have clearly no idea of the context of? Guy Fawkes intended to set up a Catholic Theocracy! He absolutely intended to "terrorize the whole population!"

And abortion bombers, by definition, seek to intimidate people from getting abortions. Stop.

None of those are the entire population. They're political causes that can't be achieved via legitimate means, being forwarded via violence and terror.

That's exactly what Luigi was trying to do. Why do you think every major healthcare/Insurance CEO/Exec had extra security for a while. They were shitting themselves. Luigi was trying to change how the US healthcare system works via violence.

That's undeniable.

Also yet again avoiding the IRA. I'm noticing that pattern. They don't fit at all with your twisted definitions do they?

---
^ Hey now that's completely unfair!
http://i.imgur.com/yPw05Ob.png
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1