LogFAQs > #986376235

LurkerFAQs, Active Database ( 12.01.2023-present ), DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Which was a more dangerous attack on the US, 9/11 or 1/6?
EPR-radar 09/11/25 7:20:32 PM #23:	Voidgolem posted... without 9/11, you do not have a jan 6th because the republican party is gone, or at least diminished greatly I wish. Without 9/11, the W Bush administration would most likely have succeeded in their stated goal at that time of gutting Social Security and Medicare, with the whole-hearted approval of nearly the entire mainstream media, and with enough D traitors joining in to make that shit sandwich "bipartisan". Since Republicans are the party of plutocracy and capital, there will never be one weird trick or possible history that would end their power. --- "The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." -- 1984 <cite>EPR-radar posted [p:986376235] in Which was ... [t:81039631]...</cite> <quote>Voidgolem posted... </cite><quote>without 9/11, you do not have a jan 6th because the republican party is gone, or at least diminished greatly</quote>I wish. Without 9/11, the W Bush administration would most likely have succeeded in their stated goal at that time of gutting Social Security and Medicare, with the whole-hearted approval of nearly the entire mainstream media, and with enough D traitors joining in to make that shit sandwich "bipartisan".Since Republicans are the party of plutocracy and capital, there will never be one weird trick or possible history that would end their power. --- "The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." -- 1984</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1