LogFAQs > #986192551

Revelation34 posted...

That's even less justified than the other removed content.

Quite a few people (all of whom axiomatically qualify as homophobic/transphobic dungbags) consider any sort of queer content to be as harmful to children as outright porn or other, more traditional "corrupting influences." They're wrong, of course (the queer aspect only causes "harm" if you believe that a kid coming out instead of remaining closeted their whole life is a bad thing, which has no basis in anything except arbitrary homophobia), but in their eyes, stamping out queer content is just as morally justified as stamping out any other content that's "harmful to kids."

willythemailboy posted...

Has ooger seriously gone full "I reject your reality and substitute my own"?

To be fair he did provide a source. Whether it's a credible source that supports the conclusion he's trying to present remains in question, but a source is there.