LogFAQs > #985925271

LurkerFAQs, Active Database ( 12.01.2023-present ), DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Started collecting the Final Fantasy MtG cards. AMA
Dalthine 07/29/25 12:44:40 PM #45:	Rharyx211 posted... That's so bizarre. There's over 1000 cards. No real excuse to not include everyone. Fuckin Clive's pet chocobo and the Wandering Minstrel from 14 even get cards smh. It's 750ish unique cards I believe, not counting art variants. And 350ish are the Commander cards, so restricted to 6, 7, 10, and 14 while still needing other cards of those games in the main set. I'd agree that it feels bad (especially when the party is small like in 5), but I can still kind of see why game design wise. Party members are Legendary, which makes them a bit harder to build around. Even missing this many party members, I think I saw this is the most legendary cards in a set ever. I'd rather just have all the characters though. <cite>Dalthine posted [p:985925271] in Started co... [t:81019515]...</cite> <quote>Rharyx211 posted... </cite><quote>That's so bizarre. There's over 1000 cards. No real excuse to not include everyone.Fuckin Clive's pet chocobo and the Wandering Minstrel from 14 even get cards smh.</quote>It's 750ish unique cards I believe, not counting art variants. And 350ish are the Commander cards, so restricted to 6, 7, 10, and 14 while still needing other cards of those games in the main set. I'd agree that it feels bad (especially when the party is small like in 5), but I can still kind of see why game design wise. Party members are Legendary, which makes them a bit harder to build around. Even missing this many party members, I think I saw this is the most legendary cards in a set ever. I'd rather just have all the characters though. </quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1