LogFAQs > #985571151

LightSnake posted...

Yes, because the fantasy of being persecuted by moderate Dems is so key to your identity. That it's not true and continues to not be true is not going to sink in because an entire group has made persecution fantasies enormously key to their identity.

The people outside of New York who endorsed Mamdani amounted to....Cuomo's old employer who's long retire, and Clyburn who nobody in NYC cared about and likely that was response to Bernie Sanders endorsing Mamdani. but every time, the persecution grift machine comes out, even though Mamdani's main difficulty was as simple as "facing a high name recognition candidate as a relative unknown."

But can't take the W. Have to come up with fantasies of the "ESTABLISHMENT" sabotaging Mamdani somehow. Nobody can say what it means, when it's happened, who's going to do it, but the great betrayal MUST be coming.

preemptive whining excuses about The Establishment are tiresome. It's not 1870.

Not being funny but the people who say to vote blue no matter who are the same people willing to vote for an independent over a blue candidate in this race. People aren't complaining here than Mamdani is being sabotaged, they're complaining that the calls to unity only go one direction.

Also, was there not someone else the moderate Dems could have coalesced around? Did it have to be the disgraced sex pest?