LogFAQs > #983260908

emblem-man posted...

I don't know. I'm hesitant about saying that.

Even in a universal healthcare model, there'd still be some level of denied coverage right? Should any level of denied coverage be considered violence?

I think a government run healthcare version would be better and ultimate cheaper than our insurance model, and we'd have more transparency and choice in how it gives our medical care, but I know care rejection can still happen.

Of course care rejection is inevitable. What's not inevitable is that some small group of rich ghouls profits immensely from such rejection of care, and is therefore mightily incentivized to deny more and more care. That's pretty much why (as you say) any reasonable version of socialized medicine would be an improvement in the US.