LogFAQs > #981440643

LurkerFAQs, Active Database ( 12.01.2023-present ), DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	Kamala might win over Trump
EPR-radar 07/24/24 5:51:59 PM #32:	Diceheist posted... Nah. An anti-labor Dem. VP up against a pro-labor Ohio GOP VP is catastrophic in the Rust Belt. As if there is any such thing as a pro-labor Republican. Even if it is conceded that Kelly's vote against that bill is a problem (a concession I'm not willing to make, BTW), why is one no vote by one Democrat more significant than ~50 Republicans unanimously voting no on it? You're like an Energizer Bunny that runs on propagating dishonest Republican bullshit instead of batteries. --- "The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." -- 1984 <cite>EPR-radar posted [p:981440643] in Kamala mig... [t:80816109]...</cite> <quote>Diceheist posted... </cite><quote>Nah. An anti-labor Dem. VP up against a pro-labor Ohio GOP VP is catastrophic in the Rust Belt.</quote>As if there is any such thing as a pro-labor Republican.Even if it is conceded that Kelly's vote against that bill is a problem (a concession I'm not willing to make, BTW), why is one no vote by one Democrat more significant than ~50 Republicans unanimously voting no on it?You're like an Energizer Bunny that runs on propagating dishonest Republican bullshit instead of batteries. --- "The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." -- 1984</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1