LogFAQs > #980197155

adjl posted...

not as egregiously a transphobic nuggetwanker as somebody who does so because they want all trans people to go away, but they're still a transphobic nuggetwanker.

You may think Jordan Peterson is a nuggetwanker but you have yet to adequately support the transphobic part. Jordan Peterson's stance and the views that inform it are well explored in various interviews and other appearances. Trans people have very little if anything to do with those views. By continuing to call him transphobic you assert that his feelings about trans people are a primary motivation for him. This is factually untrue.

adjl posted...

It doesn't matter how smart or important you think you are, nothing about what you think, say, or do will ever justify doubling somebody's risk of suicide. Nothing.

To support the claim of transphobia it would be necessary to demonstrate that this is the intended outcome. Transphobia is not the result of ones actions. It is an attitude toward a trait a person has. It is found in the cause, not the effect of those actions. You are arguing the result is the same when the cause is well established to be different.

adjl posted...

What if a snake eats a monkey, but the monkey is still alive inside the snake, then the snake disguises itself as a monkey again?

The snakes and the monkey are one being. It was a metaphor for ones actions matching the image of themselves that they present to the outside world. I think you just described one persons dark impulses making it so another person can no longer mask their dark impulses. This sounds like the first Darkman movie.