LogFAQs > #979415431

LurkerFAQs, Active Database ( 12.01.2023-present ), DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear

Topic List	Page List: 1
Topic	How's Fire Emblem Engage?
hereforemnant 03/17/24 11:19:47 AM #14:	Compsognathus posted... It kinda depends what you are looking for. Gameplay-wise, Engage is so much better than Three Houses. The pacing is better, the maps are better, the objectives are better. Story, characters and world-building are all better in Three Houses. The combat/game play sure. Everything else I've heard & seen/played myself says the rest of it is a downgrade. The emblems especially are awkward & don't have great interactions with more than a few people each, & the writing & characters are so off-putting along with toothpaste-chan that if it's one or the other, people should always play Three Houses <cite>hereforemnant posted [p:979415431] in How's Fire... [t:80722233]...</cite> <quote>Compsognathus posted... </cite><quote>It kinda depends what you are looking for. Gameplay-wise, Engage is so much better than Three Houses. The pacing is better, the maps are better, the objectives are better.Story, characters and world-building are all better in Three Houses.</quote>The combat/game play sure. Everything else I've heard & seen/played myself says the rest of it is a downgrade. The emblems especially are awkward & don't have great interactions with more than a few people each, & the writing & characters are so off-putting along with toothpaste-chan that if it's one or the other, people should always play Three Houses</quote> ... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List	Page List: 1