LogFAQs > #979252132

LurkerFAQs, Active Database ( 12.01.2023-present ), DB1, DB2, DB3, DB4, DB5, DB6, DB7, DB8, DB9, DB10, DB11, DB12, Clear
Topic List
Page List: 1
TopicPeople really wanted FF7 remake to be one 300 hour RPG that took 15 years to do?
Punished_Blinx
03/08/24 12:27:45 AM
#7:


Kim_Seong-a posted...
Why do so many responses to criticism resort to turning things into hypothetical binaries between what was received, and the most cartoonishly extreme example of something else? FF7 is about 30-40 hours. You could make a single 80-100 hour rpg that expands on the original in a satisfying way.

Just off the top of my head, you could cut the train graveyard from the Remake by two thirds and get rid of the entirely superfluous boss fight and story. Just treat it as it was originally, a short pace breaker between two major story parts. So much of the remake is unnecessary bloat to justify the length. >_>

Yes but it would also mean all three games would be designed completely differently. Remake and Rebirth are still designed as proper games even if the plot elements are more stretched out.

I think really it's more comparable to an adaptation than a proper remake.

---
A Fallen Mascot
... Copied to Clipboard!
Topic List
Page List: 1